Talk:Vulnerable world hypothesis

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 29 March 2025 by reviewer ToadetteEdit (talk · contribs).

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Futures studies

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Futures studies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Futures studies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Futures studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Futures studiesTemplate:WikiProject Futures studiesfutures studies
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Draft review

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I removed the unnecessary historical context in the "Easy nukes" section. All the remaining sources are covering the vulnerable world hypothesis, and what remains should be close to what you can find in the references. If you think there are still aspects that need to be modified, please provide some details. Alenoach (talk) 14:59, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

I added more references. Now, out of the 14 references, 12 are from secondary sources (all except the original paper and the Wired interview) and 12 are primarily about the Vulnerable World Hypothesis (I would say all except the ones from Nautilus and Axios, that only have a paragraph on the Vulnerable World Hypothesis). The content that comes most often and that overlaps between multiple sources is usually inspired from the original article and tends to follow the same framing. But I think 11 out of the 14 references (all source except the original paper, the Wired interview and the Aeon article) are independent. I'll let you decide whether the article should overall be considered notable enough. Alenoach (talk) 23:50, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

A metaphorical "Black Ball" being pulled from a jar.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:51, 27 January 2026 (UTC)Reply