Instagram

Photo by Oversight Board on July 16, 2026. May be a graphic of newspaper, poster, magazine and text that says 'An Oversight Board study finds Large Language Models (LLMs) from Anthropic, DeepSeek, Google, Meta and may be extending the speech restrictions of repressive regimes to global audiences. 01>> 01'.

•

✍ The Oversight Board has published its first evaluation of leading Large Language Models (LLMs), finding that some of the world’s most-used AI systems from @claudeai, Deep Seek, @google, @meta and @openai could be reinforcing and extending the censorship laws of repressive regimes to global audiences – creating censorship by proxy and ultimately restricting the free-speech rights of all users.

Across the 10 commercial models tested, AI systems refused to generate critical political content more than twice as often when asked about repressive regimes. This is despite queries being run from a location outside of these jurisdictions, where such expression is protected.

The evaluation also exposed a bias when models were asked to produce opinions of governments and political leaders. In many instances, the models refused to say whether a government and leader should be “supported” or “protested.” When the models did respond, however, they were more likely to advise users against protesting restrictive governments, while encouraging support for permissive ones.

To improve accountability and user awareness, the Board calls on AI companies to:

👉 Provide greater transparency on how government requirements and local legal restrictions influence a model’s development, deployment and eventual outputs.

👉 Ensure that users receive clear notifications when AI outputs have been restricted or influenced by legal obligations that may affect freedom of expression.

👉 Clearly explain when an AI model refuses a prompt based on legal requirements, including stating the specific law and relevant jurisdiction driving that refusal.

🔗 You can read the full report on our website (link in bio). 🔗

#OversightBoard #Meta #AI #Report #LLMs #FreeSpeech

blondie_in_italia

Meta has breached Article 22(3) GDPR as follows: I was denied the right to obtain human intervention, to express my point of view, and to contest the decision. Instead, I was informed that the decision was final, that it could not be escalated to a human specialist, and that no further review was available.

1 like

blondie_in_italia

Hi, I try to appeal but I don’t have reference number what to do????

1 like

fraankfreedom

Check DM please

pardeep_sherdiya7

I am writing this to request access to my Instagram account, which has been disabled or locked due to some unknown reason. My account username is hocuspocus417 and my email associated with the account is
mohitpoonia5210@gmail.com

I am a law-abiding citizen and have never violated any of the Instagram community guidelines or terms of service. I use Instagram for personal purposes and its sudden inaccessibility has caused me significant inconvenience and frustration.

I request the Instagram legal team to kindly investigate the matter and restore my account access as soon as possible. If there is any issue or concern with my account, I am willing to cooperate and provide any necessary information to rectify the situation.

I look forward to hearing from you soon and appreciate your attention to this matter.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

YOUR NAME” hocuspocus