Fostering Psychological Safety

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

  • View profile for Frank Schwab

    Non Executive Director I Strategic Advisor I Speaker

    34,919 followers

    The phrase "No risk, no return" captures the essence of decision-making in various fields, from business to personal development. It suggests that without taking risks, it is impossible to achieve significant rewards. However, while this concept is widely accepted, it is often misunderstood. People are aware that risk-taking can lead to great returns, but they sometimes overlook the fact that one risky event can wipe out all potential gains. This delicate balance between innovation, risk, and return is at the heart of success, but it requires careful management. In a world where innovation drives progress, it’s tempting to dive headfirst into uncharted territory. Yet, innovation without thoughtful risk assessment can be disastrous. Risks must be calculated, and the pursuit of new ideas should be grounded in strategic thinking. When innovators take on too much risk without safeguards, a single failure could destroy not only their return but also their chances of recovery. For example, in the financial world, over-leveraging or pursuing speculative investments can result in catastrophic losses that outweigh previous gains. Therefore, the key to harnessing the benefits of risk is to experiment in a controlled way. This means testing new ideas on a small scale before fully committing to them. Whether in business or in life, controlled experimentation allows individuals and organizations to assess the potential risks and rewards of an innovation before making a significant investment. This approach doesn’t eliminate risk, but it minimizes the chance of an irreversible loss. Ultimately, balancing innovation, risk, and return requires discipline. It involves a willingness to take chances but also the wisdom to recognize when a risk is too great. By embracing calculated risks and experimenting thoughtfully, one can enjoy the rewards of success without falling prey to the devastating effects of unchecked risk. #SundayThoughts 

  • View profile for David Bland

    Helping Leaders Make Better AI & Growth Investment Decisions | Lead Author of Testing Business Ideas | Creator of the EMT System (Extract-Map-Test) | Fractional Growth Executive

    40,564 followers

    It isn't an experiment if it can't fail One of the warmup exercises I run for my workshops is to have people write down or draw what their biggest fear is with regards to running experiments in their organizations. Their responses often illustrate that far too few of us work in environments where it is safe to fail. "That we run out of patience with management" "It fails and my boss thinks I'm stupid" There is a big difference between Fail Safe and Safe to Fail in organizations. Fail Safe implies an organization that is designed to prevent failure and emphasize control. There are systems where this is applicable, often when both the problem and solution are known (and nothing changes). Safe to Fail on the other hand, acknowledges that a failure is inevitable and is designed to absorb these failures without significant impact. Here we identify and map the risk, then run experiments to address our riskiest assumptions. It is my belief that leaders are ultimately responsible for the environment of their organizations and I'm not convinced this fear of experimentation is intentional. There are several ways leaders can begin to create an environment of Safe to Fail inside their organizations:   👉 Promote an open dialogue where employees feel comfortable sharing ideas, asking questions, and expressing concerns without fear of retribution. 👉 Openly share stories of failures, lessons learned, and how these experiences contributed to growth. This helps demystify failure and frames it as a valuable learning opportunity. 👉 Recognize and reward not just successful outcomes but also the willingness to take calculated risks and experiment, even when the results are not as expected. 👉 Actively participate in experimentation, showcasing their commitment to a safe-to-fail environment. Leadership behavior sets the tone for the rest of the organization. 👉 Ensure that failures are met with constructive feedback rather than blame. This helps maintain morale and encourages ongoing risk-taking. 👉 Shift from traditional performance metrics that focus solely on success rates to metrics that value learning, experimentation volume, and adaptability. 👉 Share stories and data that highlight how experiments, even those that didn’t go as planned, contributed to the organization’s strategic goals. If you've made this shift in your organization, what has worked for you?

  • View profile for Verushca Hunter

    Chief Technology Officer @ BCX | Digital Transformation, XaaS, Technology Enablement, Artificial Intelligence, Cyber Security, Innovation

    7,792 followers

    Psychological Safety: The Hidden Catalyst for Growth Psychological safety is the belief that employees can express ideas, admit mistakes, or ask questions without fear of humiliation or retaliation. It’s the foundation of innovation and collaboration, yet many organizations unknowingly undermine it, stifling growth and driving disengagement. Why Psychological Safety Matters Without psychological safety, employees:    •   Hesitate to share innovative ideas.    •   Avoid raising concerns or pointing out mistakes.    •   Fear risk-taking, leading to stagnation and missed opportunities. This erodes trust, creativity, and team performance, creating a culture of fear that ultimately impacts the bottom line. Unintentional Behaviors That Create Unsafe Environments Even well-meaning leaders can foster psychological unsafety by: 1. Punishing Mistakes: Harsh reactions to errors discourage risk-taking. 2. Micromanaging: Overcontrol communicates a lack of trust in employees’ abilities. 3. Tolerating Bias: Favoritism or unequal treatment discourages openness. 4. Rewarding “Yes-People”: Favoring agreement over healthy conflict suppresses diverse ideas. Real-World Examples The lack of psychological safety has led to catastrophic consequences:    •   Enron: A fear-driven culture silenced employees who might have exposed unethical practices, leading to its collapse.    •   Wells Fargo: Unrealistic sales targets created a culture of fear, resulting in fraudulent behaviors to meet quotas.    •   Boeing: Employees reportedly hesitated to speak up about safety concerns, contributing to the 737 MAX crisis. Companies Getting It Right In contrast, organizations like Google and Microsoft thrive by prioritizing psychological safety. Google’s Aristotle Project found that it was the #1 factor in high-performing teams. Microsoft’s cultural shift under Satya Nadella emphasized empathy and open dialogue, fueling innovation and success. How Leaders Can Foster Psychological Safety 1. Normalize Vulnerability: Share your own mistakes to encourage openness. 2. Encourage Healthy Conflict: Value diverse opinions and constructive debate. 3. Reward Curiosity: Praise employees for asking tough questions. 4. Actively Listen: Show genuine interest in feedback and act on it. The Bottom Line Psychological safety isn’t just a nice-to-have, it’s critical for growth. Without it, innovation stalls, and the best talent looks elsewhere. By creating an environment where employees feel valued and empowered, leaders can unlock their teams’ full potential. #leadership #transformation #psychologicalsafety #Teamdynamics #Innovation

  • View profile for Ashu Garg

    Enterprise VC-engineer-company builder. Early investor in @databricks, @tubi and 6 other unicorns - @cohesity, @eightfold, @turing, @anyscale, @alation, @amperity, | GP@Foundation Capital

    43,717 followers

    Playing it safe is itself a bet, and usually a worse one than it looks. This matters most if you just graduated, because the math tilts hardest toward taking risks in the years right after school. Loss aversion is a powerful force, but over the course of a career, risk and return are tightly correlated. Consistently choosing the higher-upside path is one of the biggest determinants of how far you will go. What you want to look for is convexity: risks whose downside is capped and whose upside is unbounded. Joining a startup that folds often teaches you more than it costs. Sending a thoughtful email to someone you admire invites nothing worse than silence. That asymmetry will never tilt further in your favor than it does right after graduation, when you have the least to lose, the most time to recover, and the longest runway for good decisions to compound. Taking risks also improves your luck. Luck is a collision, an unplanned moment when a person, idea, or opportunity crosses your path. These collisions aren't completely random: you can engineer far more of them than you think. A few ways to do this: Work for people who attract talent, because their orbit will become yours. Share what you're learning in public to draw like-minded people toward you. Be useful before you're asked, so you build a reputation for taking initiative. And follow up after you've been ignored: a surprising number of connections happen on the second, third, or even fourth attempt. Each of these habits puts you in the path of more collisions. Over time, that widens the surface area of your luck.

  • View profile for James Fielding

    I help leaders create cultures where performance and humanity can finally sit at the same table. | ExCo Executive Coaching, TedX Speaker, Inclusive Leadership, Culture Repair

    20,035 followers

    "The pressure keeps them sharp." An executive client said this to me last week, defending his fear-based leadership style. I bit my tongue. Hard. Because here's what the data actually shows: Fear doesn't sharpen performance. It destroys it. When people feel psychologically safe to speak up, take risks, and be themselves at work, businesses don't just perform better. They dominate. I watched this unfold with a creative leadership team last year. Brilliant minds, struggling to perform as a group. The problem wasn't talent or strategy. It was fear. 💡 Recent BCG research confirms what I've seen: In environments with low psychological safety, 31% of employees are at risk of quitting. In high psychological safety cultures? Just 3%. That's not just a talent advantage. That's crushing the competition on retention alone. But it goes deeper: ✅ Teams with psychological safety are 76% more engaged ✅ They innovate faster and adapt to market changes more effectively ✅ They extract the full value from diverse perspectives and backgrounds The safest teams aren't just happier. They're more profitable. So what builds psychological safety? Here's what works: 💡 Normalize uncertainty. Start meetings by admitting what you don't know. "I'm not sure about the best approach here. What are we missing?" 💡 Thank people for dissent. When someone challenges your idea, respond with "That's helpful perspective. Tell me more." Mean it. 💡 Make it fail-friendly. Replace "Who messed up?" with "What can we learn here?" 💡 Create brave spaces for LGBTQ+ employees and those from underrepresented groups. ⚡ Their psychological safety directly impacts your innovation capacity. ⚡ Share your own mistakes first. ⚡ Nothing builds safety faster than a leader who models vulnerability. This isn't just radical kindness in action. It's radical business strategy. The organizations treating psychological safety as a competitive advantage are quietly outperforming those still using fear as motivation. 💭 Quick reflection: What conversation are you avoiding right now because it feels unsafe? That's where your next breakthrough might be hiding. Tag a leader who makes you feel safe to speak up. They deserve to know their impact. In Community and Kindness, Jim 💡 For more on building psychological safety through radical kindness, check out my newsletter ( Link in Bio)

  • 🔷 Career Corner Insight: Creating Psychological Safety in Teams 🔷 What makes a team truly high-performing isn’t just skill—it’s trust. And at the heart of trust lies psychological safety. It’s the foundation that allows people to ask hard questions, admit mistakes, propose bold ideas, and show up as their full selves—without fear of humiliation or punishment. In healthcare and technology especially, where innovation, precision, and collaboration intersect, the ability to speak up can be the difference between solving a challenge or staying silent and stuck. So how do leaders create psychological safety? It starts with intention: 🔸 Model vulnerability from the top. Leaders who say “I don’t know” or “I got that wrong” set the tone for openness. If you want candor from your team, show them it’s safe to be human. My mea culpa often begins with "Oops...." where it is framed appropriately based on the situation and takes full accountability for a result. The level of "Oops..." may vary, yet consistently is owned and sets up the team to share theirs too. 🔹 Reward curiosity—not just results. Encourage your team to ask questions, test ideas, and explore new approaches—even if they don’t lead to immediate wins. Innovation grows where risk-taking is respected. Incrementalism or "base hits" as I prefer to note, stack up quickly and can lead to a winning environment as it is the constant pursuit of improvement that makes an incredible impact. 🔸 Address breakdowns with empathy. When mistakes happen (and they will), shift the lens from blame to learning. Make it about process improvement, not personal fault. This builds trust and resilience. It also fosters camaraderie as people lean into one another for their expertise and are willing to share what they don't know as freely as what they do know, and it benefits everyone in terms of where there may be collective gaps and abundance to build upon. Creating psychological safety isn’t a one-time leadership tactic—it’s a culture you cultivate daily. And - it starts with you! Bonus insight: Google’s landmark Project Aristotle study found that the #1 predictor of high-performing teams wasn’t skill or experience—it was psychological safety: the ability to take risks and be vulnerable without fear of embarrassment or punishment. 💬 How are you building environments where your team feels safe to take risks and speak up?

  • View profile for Stephen Salaka

    CTO | VP of AI Agentic Engineering | “Solutioneer” Delivering Impact Across Aerospace, Defense & Manufacturing | AI, Cloud & ERP Modernization | PhD in Herding Cats (I/O Psychology) | Sci-Fi Author

    20,564 followers

    In tech, everyone talks innovation. But the real game-changer? Creating a team that isn’t afraid to fail ↓ My biggest edge in scaling tech teams? I borrowed it straight from IO psychology. It's the lever nobody talks about: Psychological safety. In the fast-paced world of tech, where innovation is king, we often overlook the human element. A team that feels safe to take risks is a team that innovates. How do you create this environment? 1. Encourage open dialogue 2. Celebrate failures as learning opportunities 3. Lead by example - admit your own mistakes 4. Reward vulnerability and honesty 5. Foster a culture of constructive feedback When team members feel psychologically safe, they're more likely to: - Share innovative ideas - Take calculated risks - Collaborate effectively - Learn from failures - Adapt to change quickly The result? A more agile, creative, and productive tech team. This approach has helped me build high-performing teams that consistently deliver groundbreaking solutions. Remember: Technology is our tool, but people are our greatest asset. Invest in your team's psychological safety and watch your innovation soar. Create an environment where your tech talent can truly thrive.

  • View profile for Candace Doby

    Founder & CEO of The Can-Do Company | Keynote Speaker | Building Courage-Ready Communicators, Leaders & Cultures through Risk Fitness | Wannabe Backup Dancer

    5,273 followers

    Managers ask me a common question: “How do I inspire courageous action on my team?” In fact, my friend and client, Carlos, recently sent me a video of someone asking a similar question: “How do we incentivize courage?” Here’s what managers really want. - They want their people to take empowered action without waiting for permission. - To speak up when something’s off or could be done better. - To contribute meaningfully without being called on (or called out). They want their people to raise their hands, take the lead, and demonstrate their brilliance. But here’s the problem: those actions are risky. There’s the risk of tension. The risk of losing cooperation or credibility. The risk of losing opportunity if their ideas aren’t received well. So, many professionals, as ambitious as they are, hold back. Managers know, though, that the shortest line to engagement and innovation is risk. Professionals have to take worthwhile risks at work to access the fullness of their potential, the kind of potential that fuels growth. If that’s what managers want, then there’s something they must do. ✨ Lower the stakes. ✨ They have to make risk-taking less risky. Here’s how: - Set the expectation. Communicate that taking worthwhile risks is not only expected, it is required. - Reward risk-taking. Recognize it publicly. Begin team meetings by naming what someone learned from a courageous move. - Invite participation. Genuinely ask for perspectives and act on them. Courage thrives where contribution is valued. - Find the yes. When someone floats a new idea, find a part, however small, that can move forward. - Listen with alertness. Your undivided attention signals safety. Safety invites speaking up. - Provide protection. Shield your team from unnecessary interference so they can take worthwhile risks with confidence. - Model courage. Say, “I don’t know.” Offer hard feedback. Pitch unpopular ideas. Let your team see what courage looks like in motion. When leaders lower the stakes, they create the conditions for courage to multiply.

  • View profile for Leah Kral

    Igniting Innovation for Greater Social Impact | 💡Helping Nonprofit Leaders Find Clarity, Launch Experiments & Spark Breakthrough Change | Author | Speaker | Consultant

    7,704 followers

    We in nonprofits who are designing program interventions should take risks, design many prototypes, and expect many of them to fail. The key is asking why it failed, and learning from it and adjusting. 🔬 Small experiments and prototypes can help us fail fast, fail small, learn, and move on. 💡 Let’s focus for a moment on a big scary word: failure. Venture capitalists accept that 80% of their investments will fail and perhaps only 20% will succeed. They view their investments as experiments that they learn from. 👓 One way of removing fear of risk taking is to focus on what we are learning. The Hewlett Foundation created a prize for grants officers for “the worst grant from which you learned the most.” When the team gathers, and a team member can volunteer to share her thinking for why she invested in a project, how she made her bets, her assumptions and unknowns, and how she came to identify what was not working. Bravo! 💪 This is an attitude that nonprofit team members, donors, and board members should embrace. 👨🚀 Astronaut Buzz Aldrin said, “failure is not a sign of weakness. It is a sign that you are alive and growing. Get out of your comfort zone and be willing to take some risks as you work on new tasks. Some individuals share an aversion to risks, but it is not foolish to accept a level of risk, as long as the magnitude and worthiness of the goal you are seeking to achieve is commensurate with your risk.” ❓ What is your experience? 

  • View profile for Josh Linkner

    2X New York Times Best-selling Author; Innovation Keynote Speaker; Co-founder & Chairman, Platypus Labs; Managing Partner, Muditā Venture Partners; 4X Dad; Professional Jazz Guitarist

    37,771 followers

    𝗔𝗻𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗯𝗲 𝗮 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻-𝗱𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗿 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮. But without psychological safety, those ideas often remain unspoken. Fear stifles innovation. In unsafe environments, employees withhold suggestions and opportunities are missed. Consider the Aluminium Company of America (Alcoa) under Paul O’Neill. Before Paul's tenure began, Alcoa was in a tight spot. Poor launches, increased competition, and a saturated market had caused a downturn in profits and enterprise value. His first speech after taking over as CEO in 1987 telegraphed his intentions and showcased his commitment to his team: “I want to talk to you about worker safety.” Here's what happened during his time in charge: • Employees felt valued. • They freely shared ideas. • Innovation increased. • Market value of Alcoa soared from $3B to $27B. The point is psychological safety fosters trust. Trust encourages risk-taking. Risk-taking drives innovation. Innovation drives profitable growth and better outcomes. 𝗧𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗮 𝗽𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗣𝗮𝘂𝗹'𝘀 𝗯𝗼𝗼𝗸: Create a safe environment. Unlock your team’s potential. Transform hidden ideas into reality. Your next (24) billion-dollar idea might be stuck in someone's head.

Explore categories