Communication In Decision Making

As Duarte grew, I’d hear feedback that decisions were made too slowly, which confused me. In reality, we didn’t have a system to recognize when the team was asking for a decision. We thought they were just informing us, so decisions would languish. We weren’t ignoring them, failing to act, or even making incorrect decisions... We just didn’t realize a decision needed to be made in the first place. It dawned on the exec team that the lack of clarity during the conversation is what slows teams down. Leaders and teams can share the same language for decision-making. Much of it is about shaping recommendations that actually lead to the right type of action and making the urgency clear. Here’s the shift that changed everything… We started mapping every decision against two factors: urgency and risk. Low risk, low urgency: Decide without me. Your team runs with it. Low risk, high urgency: Inform on progress. They update you, but keep driving. High risk, low urgency: Propose for approval. They bring a recommendation, and you decide together. High risk, high urgency: Escalate immediately. You're in it together, right now. Once my team understood which quadrant a decision lived in, they knew exactly how to approach me. And I knew exactly what my role was. The framework gave us a shared language. People can’t act on ideas if they don’t understand how decisions are made. Leaders should define how recommendations move from idea to approval to action. That transparency keeps progress from stalling. Remember: One of the biggest threats to your company isn't a lack of good ideas. It's a lack of clarity. #Leadership #ExecutiveLeadership #OrganizationalCulture #DecisionMaking

🗣️“You must be more assertive.” Last year, those five words burned into Amy’s memory. She’d walked out of her 2023 review at XYZ Global determined to “step up.” Speak more in meetings. Push harder on decisions. Stop softening her tone so she wouldn’t intimidate anyone. She did exactly that. Fast forward 12 months. Same conference room. Same 2 VPs across the table. 🔇“You’ve become too intense, need to work on softening your approach.” 😑 Amy stared at them, speechless. Wasn’t that what you asked for last year? Which version of me do you actually want? She thought about the past year: 🤔 The time she challenged a flawed budget forecast in front of the CFO, saving the company $3 million, but earning whispers that she was “abrasive.” 🤔 The time she stepped in to rescue a failing project, praised for her “grit” publicly, yet privately told she “dominated the room.” 🤔 The time she finally got invited to an executive offsite, only to overhear a VP say, “She’s great, but can be… a lot.” This is the tightrope trap senior women walk daily: • Be assertive, but not too assertive. • Be collaborative, but don’t fade into the background. • Be visible, but not “hungry.”    The same behavior praised in men (decisive, strong leader) gets women penalized as abrasive or too much. Until you set the narrative yourself, you’re trapped performing for a moving target. If you’re exhausted from balancing on a wire men don’t even see, here’s how to step off it and still rise. 1. Audit the pattern, not just the feedback • Track every piece of feedback, especially contradiction. Patterns reveal bias. If the goal keeps moving, it's not you! • Phrase to use in review: “Last year I was encouraged to increase my presence; this year I’m told to soften it. Can we clarify what success really looks like?”    2. Control the frame before the room does • Pre‑set the narrative in 1:1s and emails leading up to reviews. I.e., “This year I focused on driving results while bringing the team with me, you’ll see that reflected in project X and Y.” • This primes leadership to view your assertiveness as an intentional strategy, not a personality flaw.    3. Build echo chambers, not just results • Secure 2–3 allies who reinforce your strengths in rooms you’re not in. • Promotions happen in the absence, you need people echoing your narrative, not someone else’s. • Phrase to brief an ally: “If my leadership style comes up in review, can you speak to how I challenge decisions but still align the team?”    Women aren’t just asked to deliver results. They’re asked to perform, decode, and reframe, all while walking a wire men don’t even see. If you’re exhausted from balancing between “too soft” and “too aggressive,” stop walking the wire and start controlling the narrative. Join the waitlist of our next cohort of ⭐ From Hidden Talent to Visible Leaders ⭐ https://lnkd.in/gx7CpGGR 👊 Because leadership shouldn’t feel like an impossible balancing act.

The ability to create clarity when there’s no shortage of chaos, opinions, and competing priorities is a rare skill. In any reasonably competent company, this skill alone will help take you quite far, fairly quickly. Concretely, this means creating clarity on the main problems, clarity on the right solutions, and clarity on the action plan & priorities. Very few people can do this well even though most people possess the intelligence necessary to do it. This is because most people in the workplace have been conditioned to add more information, sound more clever, satisfy more stakeholders, and feign more precision & certainty than is possible. Few understand that clarity in a chaotic situation can only emerge from subtraction, never from addition. Clarity comes from communicating what stands out as most important, why it is most important, how it will be achieved, and last but not the least, giving people a way of thinking about why it is okay, even great, that we aren’t doing All The Other Things.

We’ve all seen variations of this comic on LinkedIn. They’re “funny” — but they also show a problem: we’re using AI with an old, document-centric mindset. Five bullets → AI inflates to 12 pages → AI compresses back to five bullets. That’s not intelligence; it’s content ping-pong. We’re optimizing for length, not for decisions. A better way: in a case like this, AI should act as a decision co-pilot, not a text generator. Instead of “write 12 pages,” ask AI to: 1. Clarify intent & audience. “What decision must be made, by whom, and by when?” 2. Build a 1-page Decision Brief: recommendation, three supporting reasons, risks/mitigations, options considered, next steps. 3. Link evidence, don’t paste it: connect to the data and surface the few charts or numbers that matter. 4. Generate fit-for-purpose outputs: • exec email (≤200 words with clear ask) • one-slide visual for the meeting • optional appendix with traceable sources 5. Push back when inputs are weak: ask for gaps, assumptions, and thresholds that would change the recommendation. 6. Automate the loop: monitor the underlying data and update the brief if something material changes. Try this prompt: “Turn these 5 bullets into a 1-page Decision Brief for [audience]. State the recommended action, key reasons, risks, alternatives, and next steps. Produce: (a) a 200-word exec email with a clear decision request, (b) a single summary slide, and (c) links to supporting data. Ask me any clarifying questions first.” Write less. Decide faster. Deliver clarity. #AI #AgenticAI #DecisionIntelligence #Productivity #FutureOfWork #Leadership #Communication

I used to believe that being assertive meant being aggressive. The reality is that you can both assert yourself and be kind. 5 proven tips to be more assertive (without being aggressive): 1/ Express your needs and wants clearly Why: Being direct and honest about your needs helps others understand your perspective and enables them to respond appropriately. It demonstrates self-respect and confidence in your own opinions and feelings. How: "I appreciate your input on this project, but I strongly believe we should take a different approach. Focusing on user experience will lead to better conversion. Can we discuss how we can incorporate both of our ideas?" 2/ Use "I" statements to communicate your perspective Why: "I" statements help you take ownership of your thoughts and feelings without placing blame or making accusations. They create a non-confrontational atmosphere that encourages open dialogue and mutual understanding. How: "I appreciate the effort you've put into this presentation, but I have some concerns about the accuracy of the data. I suggest we review the sources together and make any necessary updates to strengthen our case." 3/ Practice active listening and seek to understand others Why: Active listening demonstrates that you value others' perspectives and are willing to engage in a two-way conversation. It helps build trust and rapport, making it easier to find mutually beneficial outcomes. How: "I hear your concerns about the proposed changes to our team structure. Can you tell me more about how these changes will impact your work? I want to ensure that we address any potential issues." 4/ Offer solutions Why: Offering solutions rather than simply stating problems demonstrates your willingness to work collaboratively and find mutually beneficial outcomes. How: "I understand that you want to launch the new feature as soon as possible, but I have concerns about the current timeline. What if we break the launch into two phases? We can release the core functionality in the first phase and then add the additional enhancements in the second phase. This way, we can meet the initial deadline while ensuring the quality of the final product." 5/ Learn to say "No" when necessary Why: Saying "no" to unreasonable requests or demands demonstrates self-respect and helps you maintain control over your time and resources. It also helps prevent burnout and enables you to focus on your priorities. How: "I appreciate you considering me for this new project, but unfortunately, I don't have the capacity to take on additional work at the moment. I'm committed to delivering high-quality results on my current projects, and taking on more would compromise this. Can we revisit this opportunity in a few weeks when my workload is more manageable?" What’s one thing that helped you become more assertive? PS: Assertiveness is a form of self-care that also nurtures healthy, respectful relationships with others. Image Credit: Jenny Nurick

Microsoft just promoted 4 sales leaders to EVP. The press release buried the real story. One line stood out: "Keep the feedback loop between customers and product decisions as small as possible." Read that again. Microsoft—a company with 220,000 employees—is restructuring its entire sales leadership to shrink the distance between what customers need and what product builds. 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗖𝗥𝗢𝘀: Microsoft isn't doing this for fun. They're doing it because "AI is being adopted at extraordinary speed, and customers expect these capabilities to come to life in their business faster than ever before." Translation: The old model—sales captures feedback, passes it to product, product builds it 18 months later—is dead. Customers won't wait. Competitors won't wait. Your org structure can't wait either. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗲𝗲𝗱𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗽 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺 𝗶𝗻 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝘀𝗮𝗹𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗿𝗴𝘀: • Reps hear what customers actually need • That insight gets buried in CRM notes nobody reads • Product builds features based on internal roadmaps • Customers churn because their problems never get solved • Everyone blames "alignment issues" The loop is too long. The signal gets lost. Deals die in the gap. 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗠𝗶𝗰𝗿𝗼𝘀𝗼𝗳𝘁 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝘀: When you elevate sales leaders to EVP and give them direct lines to product strategy, you're not just promoting people. You're compressing the feedback loop by design. Customer pain → Sales leadership → Product decision. No 6-month committee reviews. No "we'll add it to the backlog." No lost-in-translation moments. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗥𝗢 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: How long does it take for customer feedback from your sellers to influence a product decision at your company? If the answer is "months" or "I don't know," your feedback loop is a competitive liability. The companies winning in AI aren't just deploying faster. They're learning faster. And learning speed is a function of feedback loop length. How compressed is your customer-to-product feedback loop?

"I have a bone to pick with you." That's how I opened a recent conversation with an executive. Spoiler: It didn't land well. 🫠 (𝘐’𝘮 𝘴𝘸𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘓𝘪𝘯𝘬𝘦𝘥𝘐𝘯, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘐 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘯𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘴, 𝘴𝘰 𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘵 𝘨𝘰𝘦𝘴.) I came in with a strong point of view, ready to advocate for my position. It was in opposition to a decision she made but that could still be changed. "She'll appreciate that I have conviction!" I thought confidently. But instead of sparking a productive debate, I miscalculated. The executive gently stopped me. She offered advice I'll never forget and have been thinking about days since: "Consider the context around how I made this decision." In that moment, I realized I'd skipped a crucial step: curiosity before challenge. Here's what I learned about challenging up, why my approach was all wrong, and what you can learn from my mistake. This advice is great if you're a current or aspiring #chiefofstaff but also applicable to anyone working to improve their persuasion skills. 1️⃣ 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗶𝗼𝘀𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗯𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘃𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻. Instead of jumping in with a firm stance, start with, "I'm curious how you landed on this decision." This simple shift creates space for dialogue. It might even change your perspective before you voice your challenge. (In my case, as soon as I had more context, I changed my tune. If only I had led with curiosity...) 2️⃣ 𝗞𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗽𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘃𝘀. 𝗮 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗣𝗢𝗩. Here's how I think about the difference: An informed opinion means you've thought critically but remain open to learning; a strong point of view (POV) usually means you've already decided the best course of action and are looking for buy-in. Generally, if the decision is in your domain/area of expertise, it's good to have your recommendation (POV) ready. For broader strategic decisions, almost always seek to understand first. 3️⃣ 𝗙𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀 — 𝗮 𝗹𝗼𝘁. Compare "I disagree with this approach" to "Here's something I've been thinking about. Could I share my perspective?" Both convey your conviction, but one does it WAY more effectively. The former shuts down dialogue; the latter invites discussion. This experience taught me an important truth: The most effective persuaders aren't just those with strong convictions. They're the ones who master the dance between inquiry and advocacy. 💃 And even in an AI-driven world, persuading other humans will continue to be an in-demand skill. Whether you're early in your career or sitting at the executive table, understanding this balance can transform how your points are received. It might even change some strong opinions you thought you had. It did for me. (𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘸𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘯 𝘣𝘺 𝘢𝘯 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘈𝘐.)

Communication isn't what you say. It's what everyone hears. And not just what they hear passively. But what action your words inspire in them. If you're leading a team, remember: • 90% of your team didn't hear you the first time • 50% didn't hear you the third time • 10% never will Clear communication requires repetition. When you're sick of saying it, they start to hear it. Here's the pattern the best communicators follow: 1. Create Systems Don't rely on one-off conversations. Build processes that reinforce the message consistently. Different formats for different learners. 2. Embrace Repetition Clarity requires persistence, not perfection. Say it again. Then say it differently. Then say it again. 3. Verify Understanding Check what was heard, not what was said. Ask: "What did you take away from that?" Create feedback loops that close the gap. Here's how the world's best leaders put these patterns into practice: Satya Nadella's "Model-Coach-Care" ↳ Shows the way personally first ↳ Coaches others through the change ↳ Demonstrates genuine care for outcomes "Don't be a Know-It-All. Be a Learn-It-All." Ray Dalio's "Radical Transparency" ↳ Records every meeting at Bridgewater ↳ Makes them available to all employees ↳ Uses real-time feedback tools "Lead discussions by being assertive AND open-minded. At the same time." Andy Grove's "Disagree and Commit" ↳ Encouraged vigorous debate before decisions ↳ Required full alignment after decisions ↳ Made dissent safe, but execution non-negotiable "Let chaos reign, then rein in chaos." Steve Jobs's "Three-Story Rule" ↳ Every product launch told three stories maximum ↳ Repeated the same core message relentlessly ↳ Made complex ideas simple and memorable "Simple can be harder than complex." Reed Hastings's "Context Over Control" ↳ Netflix's culture deck shared widely for transparency ↳ Attracts the right people before they even apply ↳ Replaces rules with shared understanding "Don't tolerate brilliant jerks. The cost to teamwork is too high." The best leaders aren't the best speakers. They're the best at being understood. And they never stop until they are. 🔔 Follow Dave Kline for more leadership insights. ♻️ Share to help other leaders communicate with impact.

“He thought aggression = leadership. He was wrong.” The country head walked into the room like a storm. Voice loud, footsteps heavy, eyes sharp enough to cut. In meetings, he snapped at juniors. “That’s a stupid idea.” “Don’t waste my time.” “Just do what I say.” Every word landed like a whip crack. At first, people obeyed out of fear. But slowly, the air in the office grew heavy—silence in corridors, fake nods in meetings, ideas swallowed before they were spoken. I still remember one meeting. A young manager, clutching her notepad with sweaty palms, tried to contribute: “Sir, what if we—” Before she could finish, he cut her off: “Not useful. Next.” Her face flushed. She sank back into her chair. And with her, ten other unspoken ideas disappeared from the room. Later, in a one-on-one, he told me proudly: “See, I run a tight ship. They know who’s in charge.” That was his vulnerability—he mistook fear for respect, and aggression for authority. I had to hold up the mirror. 👉 “Fear creates compliance. But it kills creativity. You don’t have a tight ship—you have a sinking one.” We started training him in assertive communication—firm, but respectful. • Replacing “That’s stupid” with “Help me understand your logic.” • Practicing listening without interruption. • Learning to challenge ideas without crushing people. At first, he resisted. “This feels too soft,” he said. But slowly, he began to notice the shift. Weeks later, in another meeting, the same young manager spoke up again. This time, he leaned in and said: “Go on. Tell me more.” The room felt different. Shoulders relaxed. Pens moved again. Ideas started flowing. And at the end of the quarter, when his team hit record numbers, he admitted: “I thought respect came from fear. I was wrong. Respect comes from trust.” 🌟 Lesson: Aggression silences. Assertiveness empowers. Fear creates short-term compliance. Respect creates long-term results. Great leaders don’t intimidate their teams. They inspire them. #ExecutivePresence #LeadershipDevelopment #CommunicationSkills #SoftSkills #Assertiveness #Fortune500 #BusinessGrowth #TeamCulture #Leadership

Michael Beer, a Harvard Business School professor, identified six key barriers that quietly undermine organisational strategy execution. These "Silent Killers" prevent businesses from achieving their full potential. ☑ Unclear or Conflicting Strategic Priorities ↳ Misaligned goals confuse employees and dilute focus. ☑ An Ineffective Senior Team ↳ Dysfunctional leadership undermines collaboration and trust. ☑ A Top-Down or Laissez-Faire Leadership Style ↳ Overbearing or disengaged leadership limits innovation and buy-in. ☑ Poor Vertical Communication ↳ Fear or bureaucracy prevents honest feedback, leaving leaders in the dark. ☑ Poor Cross-Functional Coordination ↳ Silos and unclear responsibilities create inefficiencies and delays. ☑ Inadequate Leadership Development ↳ A lack of skilled leaders weakens change efforts and momentum. How to Overcome These Killers Beer emphasizes the importance of an open and honest dialogue to address these barriers: - Clarify priorities to align the organization. - Build cohesive leadership teams that foster trust and collaboration. - Encourage two-way communication for transparency and feedback. - Break down organizational silos to improve coordination. - Invest in leadership development to ensure long-term success. Strategy is only as strong as its execution. Identifying and addressing these barriers is critical to driving meaningful progress. Ps. If you like content like this, please follow me 🙏