There were times in my career when I thought silence was a sign of a healthy customer relationship. If there were no escalations, no complaints, and no urgent issues demanding attention, I assumed things were working exactly as they should. Of course, now I see all the flaws in that thinking. Silence is comfortable. It allows us to believe everything is fine and avoid difficult conversations. But the absence of problems is not the same as the presence of trust. Some of the customers I worried about most were the ones who challenged us regularly. They asked difficult questions, pushed back on our assumptions, and told us when we missed the mark. These customers were investing energy in the relationship because they believed their feedback mattered. The customers I should have paid closer attention to were often the quiet ones. They still attended meetings, responded to emails, and fulfilled their commitments, but the questions became less frequent and the challenges disappeared. What looked like satisfaction was withdrawal. People rarely stop speaking because everything is perfect. More often, they stop speaking because they no longer believe their voice will make a difference. Which of course brings some real relationship insights: 𝗔𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 A customer can attend every meeting and still be disengaged. What matters is whether they are still investing themselves in the relationship. People who care contribute more than time; they contribute energy. When those signals begin to fade, it is time for a more honest conversation. The signals can look like this: * Asking thoughtful questions * Challenging assumptions * Bringing new ideas into the conversation 𝗠𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗿𝗼𝗼𝗺 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘂𝗻𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗳𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 One of the most valuable questions I have learned to ask is: ‘If you were making the renewal decision today, what would hold you back from moving forward immediately?’ The answer often tells me more about the health of the relationship than a dozen status updates ever could. I have become less concerned by difficult feedback and more concerned by the absence of it. When concerns go unspoken, it is often because someone has already decided that raising them will not change anything. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 Some customers genuinely prefer a low-touch relationship. They are self-sufficient and do not need frequent interaction. But that is usually something you learn early. It should not become an explanation you create after engagement starts fading. What I have come to appreciate is that relationships rarely end suddenly. They weaken gradually, often long before the outcome becomes visible. Most leaders worry when people complain. I have become more concerned when they stop. Complaints mean they still care. Silence often means they don't.
Understanding Customer Buying Signals
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
-
-
In the high-stakes arena of #B2BSales, particularly when engaging the C-suite and Boards, "back of napkin math" is more than just a display of acumen – it's a potent catalyst for building #trust. Imagine a conversation where a senior leader articulates a critical business challenge, perhaps around CAC payback or share of wallet. The seller who can immediately and fluently grasp the underlying financial equation and articulate the potential impact of their solution, without missing a beat, speaks a language that resonates deeply. This isn't about complex modeling done offline; it's the agility to understand core drivers of their success and perform quick, insightful calculations within the flow of the conversation. For instance, if a Chief Revenue Officer (#CRO) mentions a goal of reducing customer churn, a seller with this skill can instantly frame the value of their solution in terms of retained revenue and lifetime customer value, demonstrating a tangible understanding of the CRO's priorities. This competence signals the seller not only listened - but also deeply comprehends which levers to use to solve the client problem. Why is this so crucial for building trust? Because it showcases several key elements that senior leaders value: Deep Understanding: The ability to perform this kind of rapid analysis demonstrates you've done your homework and truly understand their business model, challenges, and objectives. It moves you beyond being a mere vendor to a knowledge partner. #CustomerUnderstanding Intellectual Horsepower: It signals a sharp mind and the capacity to think strategically about their business. This builds confidence in your ability to deliver real value. #StrategicThinking Efficiency and Respect for Time: Senior executives are time-constrained. A seller who quickly gets to the heart of the financial implications respects this constraint and demonstrates a focus on outcomes. #TimeEfficiency Transparency: By engaging in these on-the-spot calculations, you reveal your underlying assumptions and logic, fostering a more transparent discussion. #TransparentCommunication Credibility: It elevates your status from a product peddler to a trusted advisor who speaks the language of business results. #TrustedAdvisor Think about it: when a seller can seamlessly weave in relevant financial implications – the potential ROI, payback period, impact on key KPIs – it’s not just data; it demonstrates commitment to the customer's success. It shows you're thinking beyond the product/service features and instead - are focusing on their strategic outcomes. To be clear - "Back of napkin math" isn't about being precisely accurate in real-time. It's about demonstrating a strong intuitive grasp of financial levers that matter to the customer and the ability to articulate value in their terms, instantly. This fluency builds a bridge of trust, making conversations more meaningful and impactful. #Gartner
-
This week on The Modern Customer Podcast, Megan Burns—a Fortune 500 advisor and keynote speaker with over 20 years of experience—joins me to share how she’s helped companies like Microsoft, Dow, Workday, FedEx, Akamai, DHL, Verizon, and AT&T build customer-centric cultures and deliver exceptional experiences at scale. Megan dives into the foundational role of trust in customer experience—and why it’s essential for building lasting relationships. She explains how companies can tackle the operational challenges that come with growth and align their teams to better meet customer needs. From measuring trust through transparency and reliability to creating a culture that prioritizes connection, this conversation is packed with practical insights. 🎧 Tune in now to learn how to make trust the cornerstone of your customer experience strategy—and empower your teams to deliver it!
-
I used to think personalization meant swapping the first name and job title. It doesn’t. And that gap is exactly why so much outreach from technical sales teams gets ignored. Buyers can tell the difference between a message that was customized and a message that was researched. Customized sounds like: “Hi Sarah, I saw you’re the VP of Operations at XYZ Company.” Researched sounds like: Saw you're expanding production capacity. That usually puts pressure on vendor reliability and uptime before procurement even gets involved." One sounds like a template. The other sounds like you did the homework That distinction matters for CEOs because poor outreach doesn’t just create a pipeline problem. It creates a positioning problem. When your sales team reaches out with shallow messaging, your company sounds like every other vendor in the market. And in technical sales, that’s dangerous. Your buyer is evaluating risk, complexity, timing, operational impact, implementation requirements, and long-term fit. The message has to show business understanding before the seller ever asks for a meeting. The problem is that real research takes time. And for technical sellers managing territories, accounts, product knowledge, customer issues, and long sales cycles, research often becomes the bottleneck. That’s why I like what lemlist is doing with Agentic Enrichment. Their Website and LinkedIn agents pull company and contact context automatically before the message is written. So your team isn’t choosing between speed and relevance. They can start with better signals, stronger context, and a clearer reason to reach out. The seller still needs strategy. The seller still needs judgment. The seller still needs to understand the customer. But the research doesn’t have to slow down the entire outbound process. For CEOs, that’s the real opportunity. Not more activity. Better activity. What would change if your technical sales team stopped sending more outreach and started sending better researched outreach?
-
It surprises me how many e-commerce brands pretend to offer a personalized storefront, but show the same store to everyone. The attached visual that shows what a modern storefront actually looks like behind the scenes, which is a simple system that reacts in real time. Thought it would be useful to break this down into three stages with the recommended tech stack below: Stage 1: Signals (data in) You capture (live) what’s already happening the moment someone arrives. How they got there, what they’re doing, what device they’re on, and whether they’ve bought before. Typical stack: • Segment or RudderStack for event capture • Shopify events and customer data • Google Tag Manager • Meta / TikTok UTMs for paid context Focus on clean, real-time signals without overengineering identity. Stage 2: Decisions (what to show) Those signals get turned into a simple decision immediately. Which message, which products, which path makes sense for this visitor right now. If it’s not fast enough to change the first screen, it doesn’t count. Typical stack: • Dynamic Yield or Nosto • Vercel edge logic • Cloudflare Workers • Simple rules or light models, not heavy AI Remember, speed beats sophistication. Stage 3: Experience (what changes) The storefront responds on arrival. The hero, first product grid, and primary CTA change instantly so the site feels relevant from the first moment. Typical stack: • Shopify Hydrogen or native Shopify sections • Contentful or Optimizely • Server-side or edge-rendered changes, not client-side flicker Important, personalize above the fold first. A returning high-value customer sees new arrivals and a faster path to checkout. A first-time visitor from paid sees a clearer offer and fewer choices. A deal-driven shopper sees bundles and savings upfront. Everything else comes later. If you want to start without overengineering: • Pick the two audiences that matter most • Personalize only the hero and first product grid • Measure lift on conversion rate and revenue per session • Add complexity only after this works Start simple: focus on one working example that proves the storefront can adapt in real time in a way customers actually feel.
-
If your go-to-market strategy relies heavily on targeting ‘Series B startups with 50-100 employees that just raised a funding round’, guess what… You’re fishing where 1,000 more competitors are fishing. That’s the reality for most marketing teams… 🐟 Fishing in the same pond with the same bait. And with generic targeting, the message also becomes generic and gets drowned in the sea of sameness. If strategy = knowing where to play and how to win… 🎯 The goal of signals is to help you understand where (& when) to play. 📓 But more importantly, they help with ‘how to win’. They help you craft a smarter way to win. While your competitors are still using surface-level signals (company size, recent funding), the best marketers are digging deeper: - Technology stack changes and migrations - Engineering team hiring velocity - Executive speaking engagements - Social media comments on key topics - Pricing page updates These nuanced signals reveal CONTEXT. The why behind the what. When a company just raised Series B, it's just noise. When they're simultaneously hiring 3 DevOps engineers, migrating from legacy infrastructure, and their CTO is speaking about scaling challenges – that's a signal. Then, your message isn't the same one they heard 47 times this week: ‘Congrats on your funding round’ Instead, your message is: "I noticed you're building out your DevOps team while transitioning infrastructure. Have you thought about how you can [specific outcome] in 60 days without disrupting your current roadmap?" Your differentiation doesn’t just lie in what you’re selling. It lies in how deeply you understand THEIR MOMENT. Everyone has access to the same basic data, but the competitive advantage lies in finding and blending new signals, interpreting them well, and landing a message that resonates given that context. Clay has launched custom signals recently, and it will lead to even more interesting experiments in this area. At Paddle, we watch for a whole range of moments that matter… - When more than 30% of a digital product company's web traffic comes from outside their home country (a signal that they are likely selling to a variety of markets, and will need sales tax compliance and local payment methods) - When a mobile app builds out a web property (a signal that they are likely to invest in a new web channel, and at some point, monetise there!) - When a large enterprise hires for or announces a new product-led offering (a signal that are investing in a new motion that will need to be flexible, fit for global scale, and fully compliant from day 1) Instead of 'fishing' where and how all your competitors are fishing... stop, think, and start to understand the companies you want to serve. Their context, the signals that indicate this, and the moments these lead to.
-
Your prospects are lying to you. Not about budget.... About what's really stopping them from buying. Most sellers spend 90% of their time convincing people why they SHOULD buy. But completely ignore why they WON'T. It's like Eminem in 8 Mile. Remember that final battle? He called out every single reason someone could use against him. Took away their ammo. Left them speechless. That's exactly what you should be doing in sales. The Unspoken Objections (The Real Reasons People Don't Buy): Fear - "What if this doesn't work and I look stupid?" - what do you think your prospects are afraid of with your product, get ahead of it. Pain of Change - "Learning something new sounds exhausting" - how hard do your prospects believe the change process will be? Uncertainty - "I don't trust that this will actually deliver" - Have they ever done something like this before? Past Experience - "We tried something like this before..." Ego/Commitment - "Admitting we need help means I've failed" Being Wrong - "What if I pick the wrong solution?" Things are OK - "We're not dying, so why rock the boat?" Lack of Understanding - "I don't even know what this does" Most reps pray these never come up. Winners address them before they're even thought. The 8 Mile Approach to Selling: Instead of: "Our product increases productivity by 47%" Try: "I know you're probably thinking 'another tool to learn' - here's why this one's different..." Instead of: "We have 500 happy customers" Try: "You've probably been burned by vendors before. Here's what we do differently..." Instead of: Hoping they don't bring up price Try: "Yes, we're expensive. Here's why companies still choose us..." When you proactively address the unspoken objections: 1. You build massive trust (they think "wow, they get it") 2. You control the narrative 3. You eliminate their escape routes 4. You sound like a peer, not a pitcher The uncomfortable truth? People don't buy because of what you tell them. They don't buy because of what they tell themselves. And if you're not addressing what they're telling themselves, you're just another rep making noise. Stop selling features. Start dismantling fears. Your close rate will thank you. Sit down. Map these out in the messaging process (this applies to outbound just as much as it does demos) Get to work. Now everybody from the 313...
-
Speed is not a soft skill. It is a signal. Every minute a response is delayed, prospects begin forming their own story about a brand. In one comparison between two vendors contacted on the same day, one responded within minutes with a clear, thoughtful reply. The other followed up days later with an apology for the delay. Nothing about pricing or product differed, yet trust formed instantly toward the faster responder, long before any sales conversation began. That is the quiet reality of response time. In B2B, trust is rarely built only through presentations or proposals. It forms in everyday interactions, inbox replies, DMs, and comment threads. A timely, human response communicates organization, attentiveness, and respect. A slow response, even with good intentions, can feel like disinterest. In markets where offerings often look similar, perception becomes the differentiator, and speed shapes that perception. This week’s newsletter explores why response time is more than an operational metric. It is a trust signal. The piece breaks down the psychology behind fast engagement and shares a practical framework for building responsiveness into systems without sacrificing quality. For teams thinking about reputation, pipeline momentum, and buyer confidence, it is a timely read.
-
One of the biggest reasons deals stall isn’t that buyers doubt your solution—it’s that they doubt their ability to make the right choice. Matt Dixon's research for The JOLT Effect found that 40% of lost deals are driven by customer indecision, not preference for a competitor. And Brent Adamson's new book The Framemaking Sale highlights that customers with high decision confidence are TEN TIMES more likely to make a purchase. Here are a few ways you can help buyers build confidence in themselves: 1. Reduce Decision Complexity According to Gartner, 77% of B2B buyers report their last purchase was “very complex or difficult." Streamlining options, providing decision guides, or recommending a clear best-fit reduces “analysis paralysis” and gives buyers confidence they aren’t missing something. 2. Reframe Risk in Personal Terms Buyers often fear personal blame more than organizational failure. Use case studies and peer validation to show how people in their role succeeded—helping them feel safe and supported in their choice. 3. Provide Buyer Enablement Tools Tools like ROI calculators, pre-built board decks, or checklists reduce the burden on them and demonstrate that they have what they need to decide. 4. Normalize Their Concerns The JOLT Effect also emphasizes “normalizing indecision” as a critical skill—buyers need to know hesitation is common and that you can guide them through it. Framing uncertainty as a normal step in the process reduces the shame that often delays action. 5. Signal Post-Decision Support Harvard Business Review highlights that buyers who see strong post-sale support are more confident in making initial commitments. Show them the path forward—onboarding, customer success, peer communities—so they know they won’t be left alone after purchase. Helping buyers feel personally confident and protected is as important as proving your product’s value. The most successful marketers and sellers don’t just build confidence in the solution—they build confidence in the decision-maker.
-
We scraped Google Maps photos of 2,000 bakeries and used AI to detect bread-making machines 🥖 Sounds insane, right? But this is exactly the kind of custom signal that’s replacing generic intent data in 2026. Everyone’s buying the same intent data. Which means everyone’s reaching out to the same prospects, at the same time, with the same “personalized” message. Which means you are always standing in the same line with your competition. Here’s what changed our entire GTM approach at SalesCaptain: We stopped relying on off-the-shelf signals. and started building our own. Not: – Hiring intent from ZoomInfo – Funding announcements from Crunchbase – Sales Navigator filters everyone else is using Instead, we built signals only we had access to. Here are some real-life examples from our client work: 1. Wellness and self-care software company 💇♀️ - Scraped Google Maps + websites for salons/spas - Detected multiple locations or recent expansions - Identified operators outgrowing spreadsheets/manual tools - Triggered outreach during operational scaling Result: 400+ positive replies in 5 months 2. Cybersecurity company 🥷 – Monitored public breach reports in real time – Identified relevant security teams – Reached out while the problem was active Result: $200K+ ACV meetings in a single quarter 3. Recruitment platform 💼 – Scraped job listings across multiple sources – Identified companies actively hiring – Matched HR decision-makers to real demand Result: 710+ demo calls in 10 months These aren’t signals you can buy from a vendor. They’re competitive advantages built from: – Custom data sources – AI enrichment of unstructured data – Community, ecosystem, and event signals The pattern I see across every high-performing GTM team: They don’t ask, “Which intent tool should we buy?” They ask, “What data would give us an unfair advantage competitors can’t access?” Then they build it! If you want to design custom signals for your market and orchestrate them across sales, marketing, and ops, you know where to find me. 😎